A physicist probes the metaphysical (From Nature)

Starry sky over water in Maine

Contemplating the night sky in Maine became a metaphysical experience for physicist Alan Lightman.Credit: Christopher Georgia/Aurora Photos

Searching for Stars on an Island in Maine Alan Lightman Pantheon (2018)

With his debut novel, Einstein’s Dreams (1992) — the poetic musings of a Swiss patent clerk on the nature of time — theoretical physicist Alan Lightman revealed an enthusiasm for entering the human psyche. His latest book, the collection of essays Searching for Stars on an Island in Maine, goes further. Here, Lightman confronts the contradictions that arise from having a rigorous scientific world view, alongside his own mortal desires and fears.

Lightman begins Searching for Stars with an account of a mystical experience. He’s motoring through the coastal waters off mainland Maine, towards Pole Island, where he has a summer home. It’s a moonless night. Before he docks, Lightman turns off the boat’s motor and running lights, and lies down in the silence and darkness. “After a few minutes, my world had dissolved into that star-littered sky. The boat disappeared. My body disappeared … I felt connected not only to the stars but to all of nature, and to the entire cosmos.” With that, Lightman begins an exploration of the tensions, both within himself and without, between the materialist reductionism of science, especially physics, and the absolutes of spiritual belief.

As a physicist, he knows there are no absolutes. The idea of a fixed and motionless Earth was disproved in 1851 by the “slow rotation of the plane of a swinging pendulum” — physicist Léon Foucault’s experiment — which could be explained only if the planet, not the pendulum, was rotating. Discoveries of the electron and radioactivity showed us that even atoms, once thought indestructible, were anything but. Next, Albert Einstein demolished Newtonian notions of absolute space and time. Then came quantum mechanics, with its claims of uncertainty and indeterminism.

For anyone looking to science for assurance, the bottom falls out. So, Lightman looks past it. “I am a scientist, but I am not a swinging bob on a string,” he writes.

He sets the stage for a dialogue, introducing us to the usual suspects in science: Galileo Galilei, J. J. Thomson, Ernest Rutherford and Einstein; and to a handful of spiritual thinkers and religious figures. We meet, for instance, fleetingly, the Indian poet and Nobel laureate in literature Rabindranath Tagore; and, more substantially, Augustine of Hippo, the influential fifth-century Christian theologian.

“Augustine’s certainties were absolute,” Lightman writes, contrasting these immutable religious ideas — such as the immortal soul — with science’s ever-evolving view. Yet, he argues, science, too, longs for an absolute in a final ‘theory of everything’, and has its article of faith: “that the physical world is a territory of order and logic”.

Lightman’s scope is sweeping, but he doesn’t dig deeply enough. For instance, he expresses disbelief in bardo — the Tibetan Buddhist term signifying the transitory state between death and rebirth. He writes: “I ask for some kind of evidence for all things I believe — even if it is evidence from a personal or transcendent experience. And I insist on evidence for any statements that concern the physical world.” Certainly, there is no ‘evidence’ for bardo, independent of the subjective experiences of Tibetan Buddhists. But Lightman stands by his own subjective experience of perceived ‘oneness’ with something larger than ourselves. A rigorous scientific approach would question the veracity of all subjective experiences, not just those that seem unreasonable at first blush.

Therein lies the book’s Achilles heel: it makes little mention of the research on perception that calls into doubt the ‘truth’ of subjective experiences, no matter how real or exalted they feel. Modern neuroscience tells us that what we perceive is not a bottom-up reconstruction by the brain of what’s out there. Rather, it is the brain’s prediction about the probable causes of sensory inputs.

Predictions, and thus perceptions, can be wrong. This is of particular importance when perceptions hint at something spiritual. It’s a subject explored, for example, in the 2015 Kabbalah: A Neurocognitive Approach to Mystical Experiences by neurologist Shahar Arzy and scholar of Jewish thought Moshe Idel. Mystical experiences are also eerily similar to those reported by people having ecstatic epileptic seizures, including feelings of time dilation and ‘oneness’, the neural underpinnings of which are under study (M. Gschwind and F. Picard Front. Behav. Neurosci. 10, 21; 2016).

The book’s narrative structure — set up as the articulate reveries of a physicist, who is alternately naturalist, stargazer and philosopher, wandering around his island, constantly thinking grand thoughts on mossy slopes — risks becoming self-parody. Lightman saves the day somewhat by acknowledging the indulgence.

However, as a broad take on intellectual thought at the intersection of science and spirituality, Searching for Stars is stimulating. Lightman is to be admired for his willingness to take off his scientist’s hat and plunge into preoccupations most of his peers would strenuously avoid, some for fear of ridicule. Once again, this deft wordsmith has effortlessly straddled the divide between the hardest of the hard sciences and the nebulous world of existential doubts and longings.

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the daily Nature Briefing email newsletter

Stay up to date with what matters in science and why, handpicked from Nature and other publications worldwide.

Sign Up


via Nature https://go.nature.com/2k0annt

April 11, 2018 at 01:11AM